Wednesday April 1, 2020
Case of the Week
Exit Strategies for Real Estate Investors, Part 14
Case:Karl Hendricks was a man with the golden touch. Throughout his life, it seemed every investment idea that he touched turned to gold. By far, Karl was most successful with real estate investments. It was definitely his passion.
Amazingly, Karl continued to buy and sell real estate at the age of 85. For instance, about three months ago, Karl discovered a great investment property. It was a "fixer-upper" commercial building in a great area. While other nearby buildings sold for over $2 million, the seller needed to sell quickly and was asking just $1 million.
The condition of the building turned many buyers away. It was being sold "as-is," but Karl was not deterred. He could see great potential with the building and knew it would not take much to get it to market condition. Therefore, Karl swooped in, bought the building for $1 million and instantly hired contractors to refurbish the place.
After three months of hard work refurbishing the building, the place looked like new! In the end, Karl invested $250,000 in the building, bringing his total investment in the property to $1.25 million. One month after the completion of the work, Karl was contacted informally by a company that expressed an interest in the building – a $2 million interest! This was no surprise to Karl. He knew the building was another great buy.
After Karl learned about the benefits of a FLIP CRUT, he eagerly wanted to move forward. (See Parts 1 and 2 for a full discussion of this decision.) It looked like the perfect solution. However, Karl did have one complaint about the FLIP CRUT solution. Because CRUT payouts are recalculated each year, based upon the January 1 value of the trust, there is an element of uncertainty associated with the future income stream. In short, Karl's payouts could go up one year and down the next.
Question:Instead, Karl would love to have a set, annuity-type of payout each year. Can Karl fund a charitable remainder annuity trust (CRAT) with his building? Which is better for Karl – a CRAT or a FLIP CRUT?
Solution:A charitable remainder unitrust (CRUT) is an excellent option for donors with appreciated real estate. A CRUT provides a charitable tax deduction, an income stream and a tax-free sale of the real estate. This tax-free sale of the real estate inside the trust allows the trustee to reinvest the full sale proceeds, i.e. investment diversification without payment of any capital gains tax.
Because of the unmarketable nature of real estate, advisors usually recommend a net income plus makeup CRUT (NIMCRUT) or FLIP CRUT. With either of these types of CRUTs, the trustee is not forced to make a trust distribution unless there is actual trust income. For this reason, a straight CRUT or CRAT generally is not recommended when real estate is the only trust property. Both of these types of trusts require trust distributions irrespective of actual trust income. If the trustee does not make the required distributions, the trustee runs the risk of disqualifying the trust and subjecting the donor and trustee to tax penalties.
While Karl's building is likely to sell quickly, there is no guarantee. Therefore, it is not prudent to create a CRAT given the risk associated with the sale process. However, if Karl is willing to transfer a substantial amount of cash and/or stocks, in addition to the building, into the CRAT, the CRAT might work nicely. The infusion of cash or stocks into the CRAT provides the trustee with the necessary funds to make trust payments and, thus, avoid missing any mandatory payments. It is extremely important that Karl transfer the cash or stocks into the CRAT at the same time as the building transfer. CRATs do not allow for additional contributions, therefore Karl could not contribute cash or stock at a later date.
Based upon his desire to enjoy fixed payments, Karl elects to transfer the building and $500,000 of appreciated stocks into the CRAT. This arrangement provides for substantial liquidity to the trust. Furthermore, when the building sells for $2 million, the lack of marketability issue will disappear. In the end, Karl loves the CRAT solution because he knows that his annuity stream will never change and he diversified a large block of his appreciated stocks.
Editor's Note: This case study illustrates that a CRAT, in limited circumstances, can work smoothly even though an unmarketable asset is inside the trust. However, in most situations, a FLIP CRUT or NIMCRUT is more advisable given the great flexibility associated with those types of trusts. Before funding a CRAT with unmarketable property, it is highly suggested that one consult with a competent tax advisor.